Skip to content
- Can You Sue Lyft in Florida? (Quick Answer)
- Why Lyft Accident Cases Are Different From Regular Car Accidents
- How Lyft's Insurance Coverage Works in Florida
- Lyft's Liability in Florida — Beyond the Driver
- Lyft vs. Uber in Florida — How the Cases Differ
- What Compensation Can You Recover?
- What to Expect When You Hire Us
- Our Florida Lyft Accident Lawyers Serve Statewide
- Why Choose Kaiser Romanello, P.A.?
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Frequently Asked Questions
Last reviewed: May 21, 2026 by Lorne Kaiser, Esq., Florida Bar No. 0568491.
Can You Sue Lyft in Florida?
Yes — in many cases, you can pursue Lyft directly in Florida, not just the individual driver. While Florida Statute §627.748 limits certain vicarious liability claims against transportation network companies, four legal theories may still survive against Lyft itself: joint venture, direct negligence in app design and business practices, negligent app design as a defective product, and strict products liability. If you were injured while a Lyft was actively transporting you or matched to a ride, Lyft's $1,000,000 commercial liability policy applies. Call Kaiser Romanello, P.A. at (844) 877-8679 for a free case review. You pay nothing unless we win.
Key Takeaways
- $1,000,000 in coverage: Lyft's Phase 3 commercial liability policy applies the moment a ride is accepted through drop-off.
- 2-year statute of limitations: Florida law gives you only two years from the crash to file suit (Fla. Stat. §95.11, as amended by HB 837 in 2023).
- Four surviving theories against Lyft: joint venture, direct negligence, negligent app design, and strict products liability may all reach Lyft's corporate assets.
- What §627.748 blocks: Vicarious liability, respondeat superior, and negligent hiring/retention/training/supervision claims against Lyft are generally foreclosed by Florida's TNC statute.
- Three insurance phases matter: App off (driver's personal policy only), app on waiting for a ride (Lyft's $50K/$100K/$25K contingent coverage), and ride in progress ($1M policy plus UM/UIM).
- Florida Lyft accident lawyers at Kaiser Romanello, P.A. handle TNC cases statewide on a contingency basis. Call (844) 877-8679 — you owe nothing unless we recover.
If you were hurt in a Lyft crash anywhere in Florida — as a passenger, another driver, a pedestrian, or a cyclist — you are facing a very different kind of case than a routine car accident. Lyft is a publicly traded technology company with a multinational claims defense apparatus, layered insurance policies, and a statutory framework (Fla. Stat. §627.748) designed to insulate the corporation from many of the most direct theories of liability.
That does not mean you have no recourse. It means you need lawyers who understand the structure — how Lyft's three-phase insurance model works, which corporate claims still survive the TNC statute, how Lyft's claims administrators differ from Uber's, and how to develop the kind of evidentiary record (app data, driver acceptance window logs, gamification flags, dispatch screenshots) that gets serious settlement offers on the table.
The team at Kaiser Romanello, P.A. has built a Florida personal injury practice that handles rideshare litigation from the city level through statewide hub coordination. We litigate against both Lyft and Uber in Florida, and we know where the leverage points are in each. Read on for a complete guide to your rights after a Lyft crash in Florida, or call us at (844) 877-8679 right now to talk to an attorney for free.
Why Lyft Accident Cases Are Different From Regular Car Accidents
A typical Florida car accident involves two drivers, two personal auto policies, and the state's no-fault PIP system. A Lyft accident layers a multinational technology company, a $1 million commercial policy, contingent coverage, third-party claims administrators, and a specific Florida statute (§627.748) on top of that already-complicated baseline.
Several factors make Lyft cases categorically harder than ordinary car wrecks:
Layered Insurance Coverage Depending on Driver Status
The very first question in every Lyft case is: what was the driver's app status at the moment of impact? The answer determines whether you are looking at $1,000,000 of coverage, $50,000 of coverage, or only the driver's personal policy — which may have minimums as low as Florida's required PIP and PDL. Lyft has every incentive to dispute that phase classification, and the only reliable evidence of phase status lives on Lyft's servers.
Corporate Defense Counsel and Specialized Claims Administrators
Lyft does not use a typical local insurance adjuster. Lyft retains a national claims administration platform and outside defense counsel experienced specifically in TNC litigation. Their playbook is not the playbook a normal auto adjuster uses. They are trained to ask phase-status questions designed to push your claim into a lower-limits bucket, and they are trained to deny corporate liability in the same breath.
A Florida Statute Designed to Protect TNCs
In 2017, Florida enacted §627.748 specifically to define and limit Lyft's and Uber's exposure. The statute classifies TNC drivers as independent contractors for liability purposes and forecloses some traditional employer-liability theories. Knowing what the statute does and does not block is the difference between a case that goes after Lyft's corporate assets and a case that settles for the driver's policy minimum.
App Data Is the Evidence
The Lyft driver app records continuous location data, ride acceptance timestamps, screen interactions, in-trip navigation prompts, and acceptance-window timers. That data is the closest thing to a black box that exists in a rideshare crash — and it is in Lyft's exclusive control. Getting it requires a preservation letter and, often, a formal discovery process. Cases handled by attorneys who do not know to demand this data tend to settle low.
You May Have Multiple Recovery Sources
A serious Lyft crash can implicate the driver's personal insurance, Lyft's contingent or commercial policy, Lyft's uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, your own PIP, your own UM/UIM coverage, and (in the case of Lyft Express Drive rentals) a fleet policy. Lining all of these up correctly — and stacking what is stackable under Florida law — is the kind of work that separates a competent Florida Lyft accident lawyer from a generalist.
How Lyft's Insurance Coverage Works in Florida
Lyft's coverage in Florida is governed by Fla. Stat. §627.748, which divides coverage into three distinct phases based on the driver's app status. Understanding which phase applies to your crash is the single most important step in valuing your case.
Phase 1 — App Off
When the Lyft driver app is closed and the driver is not logged in or available to accept rides, the driver is operating a purely personal vehicle. Only the driver's personal auto insurance applies. Lyft provides no coverage during Phase 1. If the driver carries only Florida's statutory minimums (PIP and PDL), recovery may be limited unless you have your own UM/UIM coverage or other sources of recovery.
Phase 2 — App On, Waiting for a Ride Request
Once the driver opens the Lyft Driver app and signals availability, Lyft's contingent liability coverage kicks in. Lyft provides $50,000 per person / $100,000 per accident in bodily injury liability, and $25,000 in property damage liability. This coverage is contingent on the driver's personal insurance — it sits on top of, or fills gaps in, the personal policy. Phase 2 is the phase Lyft most often disputes, because the coverage is meaningfully lower than Phase 3 and the line between “available” and “ride accepted” can be muddied by app activity logs.
Phase 3 — Ride Accepted Through Drop-Off
The moment a Lyft driver accepts a ride request, Lyft's commercial liability policy goes live and remains active until the passenger is dropped off and the ride is marked complete. Lyft maintains a $1,000,000 commercial liability policy for Phase 3, plus uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage in states that require it. Phase 3 is also when Lyft typically provides contingent collision and comprehensive coverage subject to a deductible. If you were a passenger in an active Lyft, or if a Lyft with a passenger or en route to pick up a passenger hit you, this is the policy that should apply.
The practical implication is straightforward: defendants and their counsel have a financial incentive to push every case into the lowest phase they can defensibly argue. That is why preserving Lyft's app data — ride request timestamps, GPS pings, ride status logs — is among the very first things our office does after we are retained.
Lyft's Liability in Florida — Beyond the Driver
The most common misconception about Lyft cases is that the corporation cannot be sued at all — that the statute “protects” Lyft from any direct claim. That is half-true. Florida §627.748 forecloses certain traditional employer-style theories, but four legal theories may still reach Lyft itself, and skilled plaintiffs' counsel routinely plead them.
1. Joint Venture
A joint venture exists when two or more parties combine resources to pursue a common business purpose with shared financial interest and mutual right of control. Lyft and its drivers share a common purpose (transporting riders for fares), combined resources (driver supplies the vehicle, Lyft supplies the platform, marketing, and customer base), a clear financial interest (Lyft takes a percentage of every fare), and mutual right of control (Lyft controls dispatch, acceptance thresholds, ratings, and the ability to deactivate). Courts that find a joint venture impose joint and several liability on every venturer — including Lyft.
2. Direct Negligence
This theory does not depend on Lyft's relationship with its driver. It depends on Lyft's own business practices — conduct by the corporation itself that creates an unreasonable risk of harm. Examples include acceptance window timers that pressure drivers to interact with the app while driving, continuous location-feed requirements that demand attention, gamification features such as streak bonuses and power zones that incentivize chasing rides during fatigue, and the absence of any meaningful in-drive app lockout. Each of these is a corporate design choice. Each foreseeably contributes to distracted driving.
3. Negligent App Design
The Lyft Driver app is a product that Lyft places into the stream of commerce. Like any product, its design can be challenged. The application's interface forces drivers to take their eyes off the road to accept rides within tight time windows, view turn-by-turn directions, respond to passenger messages, and interact with surge or bonus prompts. A negligent design claim alleges that Lyft failed to adopt reasonably available safer alternative designs — for example, true voice-only ride acceptance, hands-free dispatch confirmation, or automatic in-drive lockouts.
4. Strict Products Liability
Florida recognizes strict products liability for products that are unreasonably dangerous as designed. The Lyft Driver app, as a product placed in the stream of commerce, is subject to this doctrine. Critically, Florida's strict liability doctrine extends to foreseeable bystanders — not just users. That means passengers, pedestrians, and cyclists injured because of the app's design defects may bring a strict products claim against Lyft even though they did not download or use the app themselves.
Setting expectations: §627.748 generally forecloses claims against Lyft based on vicarious liability / respondeat superior and negligent hiring, retention, training, and supervision. Any lawyer who tells you those theories are the centerpiece of your Florida Lyft case is misreading the statute. The four theories above are the live ones, and they are how we get to Lyft's corporate assets and the $1M Phase 3 policy.
For catastrophic outcomes — a traumatic brain injury, a spinal cord injury, paralysis, multiple surgeries, or wrongful death — reaching Lyft's corporate exposure is not just legally important. It is often the only way to fully compensate the injured family. Our catastrophic injury team coordinates with the rideshare practice precisely so these theories are developed early and aggressively.
Hurt in a Florida Lyft Crash? Talk to a Lawyer Today.
Free, confidential case review. No fee unless we win. Statewide service from Pensacola to Key West.
Call (844) 877-8679Lyft vs. Uber in Florida — How the Cases Differ
Lyft and Uber operate under the same Florida statute (§627.748), and on paper their insurance structures look almost identical. But the cases differ in real, practical ways once you actually start litigating them. Below is a side-by-side breakdown, followed by commentary on what those differences mean for case strategy.
| Issue | Lyft (Florida) | Uber (Florida) |
|---|---|---|
| Governing statute | Fla. Stat. §627.748 | Fla. Stat. §627.748 |
| Phase 3 policy limit | $1,000,000 commercial liability | $1,000,000 commercial liability |
| Phase 2 contingent coverage | $50K / $100K / $25K | $50K / $100K / $25K |
| Claims administrator | Distinct national TPA — different intake scripts, different first-offer patterns | Different national TPA with separate playbook |
| Vehicle rental program | Lyft Express Drive (partnership with Hertz / Flexdrive). May trigger additional fleet policy. | Uber Pro / vehicle marketplace partners. Different program structure. |
| Market share in most FL cities | Smaller than Uber — fewer overall crashes but defense often more aggressive on each one | Larger volume, more standardized handling |
| Driver-app gamification | Streak Bonus, Power Zones, ride challenges — supports direct-negligence theories | Quest, Boost, surge pricing — analogous but UX is different |
| App data preservation | Requires Lyft-specific preservation letter and discovery requests | Different document and metadata structures |
What the Differences Actually Mean for Your Case
Different claims administrator playbook. Lyft and Uber use different third-party claims administrators in Florida, with distinct intake scripts, evaluator training, and first-offer ranges. The opening offer on a herniated-disc Lyft case looks materially different from the opening offer on a comparable Uber case. Lawyers who handle both develop separate negotiation models for each.
Lyft Express Drive complicates fleet liability. When the Lyft driver is operating an Express Drive rental vehicle — Lyft's program in partnership with Hertz and Flexdrive — additional liability questions arise. Who owns the vehicle? Whose policy is primary? Does the fleet-wide rental policy apply? These questions do not arise the same way in Uber crashes.
Smaller market share, more aggressive defense. In most Florida cities Lyft has a smaller market share than Uber. Counterintuitively, that often means defense counsel push harder on each individual claim — there is less concern about reputational impact in a smaller portfolio of cases, and adjusters have more room to litigate aggressively.
UX differences support distinct negligence theories. Lyft's “Streak Bonus” gamification and “Power Zone” features create their own factual record supporting a direct-negligence theory based on distracted driving incentives. Uber's analogous features (Quest, Boost) are not identical and the evidentiary build differs.
If your case involves both platforms (some drivers run both apps simultaneously, which itself raises distracted-driving issues), or if you are unsure which company the at-fault driver was working for, see also our Florida Uber accident lawyer hub for the parallel analysis.
What Compensation Can You Recover?
Under Florida law, an injured Lyft accident victim may recover both economic and non-economic damages. The amount depends on the severity of your injuries, the strength of the liability evidence, the available coverage, and Florida's modified comparative fault rule under HB 837 (2023): if you are found 50% or more at fault, you recover nothing; below 50%, your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
You will also need to meet Florida's serious-injury threshold under Fla. Stat. §627.737 to pursue non-economic damages outside the no-fault system — generally a permanent injury, significant scarring, or significant and permanent loss of an important bodily function.
Economic Damages
- Past and future medical expenses (ER, hospitalization, surgery, imaging, follow-up care)
- Future treatment and life-care planning costs for catastrophic injuries
- Physical therapy, occupational therapy, rehabilitation
- Lost wages and lost earning capacity
- Out-of-pocket prescription and medical device expenses
- Property damage to your vehicle, bicycle, or personal property
- Home modifications for catastrophic injuries (ramps, lifts, accessible bathrooms)
- In-home care and assistance
Non-Economic Damages
- Pain and suffering
- Mental anguish and emotional distress
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Permanent disability or disfigurement
- Loss of consortium (for spouses)
- Loss of services and support
- Inconvenience
- For fatal crashes: survivor damages under Florida's Wrongful Death Act
For background on how case values build in serious Florida personal injury matters, our published case results show the kind of recoveries the firm has secured across motor vehicle, rideshare, trucking, and motorcycle cases.
What to Expect When You Hire Us
Most people have never hired a lawyer before. We make the process simple and transparent. Here is exactly what happens after you call us.
Free, Confidential Case Review
Call (844) 877-8679 or use our contact form. You speak directly with an attorney, not an intake screener. We listen, ask the right questions, and tell you straight whether you have a case.
We Preserve the Evidence
Day one, we send Lyft a preservation letter for ride data, GPS logs, app status, and acceptance timestamps. We pull the FHP/local crash report, obtain 911 audio, locate witnesses, and request available surveillance video before it is overwritten.
You Focus on Treatment, We Handle Everything Else
We coordinate with your doctors, manage PIP billing under your 14-day deadline, deal with health insurance and Medicare/Medicaid liens, and keep adjusters away from you.
Investigation and Liability Workup
Accident reconstruction where appropriate, app-data analysis, identification of all responsible parties (driver, Lyft, third parties, Express Drive owner if applicable), and full damages packaging including life-care planning for catastrophic injuries.
Demand and Negotiation
We package the case — medicals, lost wages, expert opinions, future damages — and present a documented demand. Most claims settle here. Lyft's claims administrator knows when a file is built for trial and adjusts the offer accordingly.
Litigation and Trial if Necessary
If the offer is not fair, we file suit. We are courtroom lawyers, and Lyft's defense counsel know it. Most of our clients still resolve before trial — but only because the file is genuinely trial-ready.
Our Florida Lyft Accident Lawyers Serve Statewide
Kaiser Romanello, P.A. handles Lyft accident claims across the entire state of Florida. Our office is in Parkland (Broward County), and we travel for serious cases. Below are city-specific Lyft accident pages with localized information for some of our highest-volume service areas:
If your crash was in a city without a dedicated page above, we still represent you — just call (844) 877-8679. You can also see our general city-based personal injury teams:
Why Choose Kaiser Romanello, P.A.?
Florida TNC Litigation Experience
We handle Lyft and Uber cases as a core part of our practice — not as occasional one-offs. We know the statute, the playbook, and the claims administrators.
No Fee Unless We Win
Every Florida Lyft case is handled on a contingency basis. No retainer, no hourly bills, no out-of-pocket costs. You owe nothing unless we recover money for you.
Direct Attorney Access
You speak with a lawyer — not just a paralegal or a case manager. Our clients have our phones and our emails and get real answers.
Trial-Ready Files
Lyft's defense counsel know which firms try cases and which firms settle for whatever is offered. Our files are built to be tried. That fact alone changes settlement value.
Statewide Coverage From a Florida Firm
We are based in South Florida and licensed across the state. We are not a national lead-generation operation — we are a Florida law firm that takes Florida cases personally.
Catastrophic-Injury Capability
Our team handles catastrophic injury matters including traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and wrongful death cases — so we have the infrastructure to take a Lyft case as far as the injuries demand.
Meet Our Attorneys
Lorne Adam Kaiser, Esq.
Lorne Kaiser has spent his career representing seriously injured Floridians and their families. He litigates rideshare cases, catastrophic-injury matters, and complex commercial-vehicle claims across the state. He is admitted to practice in all Florida state courts and federal courts in the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida.
Steve Romanello, Esq.
Steve Romanello focuses his practice on serious personal injury and wrongful death litigation, including TNC (Lyft and Uber) cases, motorcycle crashes, commercial trucking, and hit-and-run matters. He is known for aggressive case workup and trial preparation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Florida Lyft Accidents
What should I do immediately after a Lyft accident in Florida?
First, call 911 and get medical attention — some serious injuries (concussions, internal injuries, spine injuries) do not present symptoms for hours or days. Second, screenshot your Lyft ride in the app: the driver's name, plate, ride status, and timestamps. This is evidence Lyft controls, and your screenshot is sometimes the only independent record. Third, get the police report number, photograph the scene and vehicles, and collect contact information for any witnesses. Fourth, report the accident through the Lyft app but do not give a recorded statement to any insurer until you have spoken with a lawyer. Fifth, see a doctor within 14 days — Florida's PIP statute requires medical treatment within 14 days of the crash to preserve PIP benefits. Finally, call a Florida Lyft accident lawyer. Early evidence preservation matters enormously in these cases.
Can I sue Lyft directly — not just the driver?
Yes, in many Florida Lyft cases you can pursue claims directly against Lyft, not just against the individual driver. Florida Statute §627.748 forecloses certain traditional employer-style theories (vicarious liability, respondeat superior, negligent hiring), but four theories remain viable: joint venture, direct negligence based on Lyft's own corporate conduct, negligent app design as a defective product, and strict products liability. Whether these theories apply depends on the specific facts of your crash. The strongest direct-liability cases against Lyft involve distracted driving caused by the driver app's design, gamification features that incentivize unsafe behavior, or Lyft Express Drive vehicles where additional fleet liability questions arise.
What insurance covers a Lyft accident in Florida?
That depends on the driver's app status at the moment of the crash. If the Lyft app was off, only the driver's personal auto insurance applies — Lyft provides no coverage. If the app was on but no ride was matched (Phase 2), Lyft provides contingent coverage of $50,000 per person, $100,000 per accident bodily injury, and $25,000 property damage. Once a ride is accepted and through the moment the passenger is dropped off (Phase 3), Lyft's $1,000,000 commercial liability policy is active, plus uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Your own auto insurance — including PIP and any UM/UIM coverage you carry — may also apply in addition to Lyft's policies, depending on the circumstances.
What if the Lyft driver was waiting for a ride request when they hit me?
This is the Phase 2 scenario, and it is the most commonly disputed status in Lyft litigation. If the driver had the Lyft Driver app open and was logged in as available but had not yet accepted a ride request, Lyft's contingent coverage applies: $50,000 / $100,000 / $25,000. That is meaningfully lower than the $1,000,000 Phase 3 policy, which is why Lyft and its claims administrators routinely argue cases into Phase 2 when the facts could support Phase 3. The fight is usually fact-specific — was a ride actually matched at the moment of impact? Did the driver have an accepted request? Was the app in “going home” mode? The only definitive evidence lives on Lyft's servers, which is why preservation letters and discovery requests for app data are critical.
How is a Lyft accident case different from an Uber accident case?
On paper, the cases look almost identical — both operate under Florida Statute §627.748, both maintain $1,000,000 Phase 3 policies, and both use the same three-phase coverage structure. In practice, the cases differ. Lyft and Uber use different claims administrators with distinct first-offer patterns and negotiation playbooks. Lyft's Express Drive rental program (in partnership with Hertz and Flexdrive) raises additional liability questions that do not arise in Uber crashes. Lyft's app UX — including the Streak Bonus and Power Zone features — supports certain direct-negligence theories around distracted-driving incentives. Lyft's smaller market share in most Florida cities can mean more aggressive defense on individual claims. If your crash involves both companies or you are unsure which company the driver worked for, see our Florida Uber accident lawyer page for the parallel analysis.
How long do I have to file a Lyft accident lawsuit in Florida?
Under Florida Statute §95.11, as amended by HB 837 in 2023, the statute of limitations for a negligence claim arising from a Lyft accident is two years from the date of the crash. Before HB 837, the statute was four years; the legislature cut it in half for negligence actions accruing after the effective date. For wrongful death claims, the statute is also two years. There are shorter notice deadlines if a governmental entity is involved (for example, if a city bus or government vehicle is implicated). Missing the statute means losing your right to recover. This is the single most important reason to talk to a lawyer early.
What is my Lyft accident case worth?
Case value depends on the severity and permanence of your injuries, the available insurance coverage, the strength of the liability evidence, and Florida's modified comparative fault rule (you recover nothing if you are 50% or more at fault). Soft-tissue injuries with full recovery typically resolve in the policy-minimum to mid-five-figure range. Cases involving herniated discs, surgical interventions, broken bones, or permanent impairment can push into six figures or beyond. Catastrophic injuries — traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries with paralysis, severe burns, amputations, or wrongful death — routinely justify policy-limits demands against Lyft's $1,000,000 Phase 3 coverage and may also justify claims against additional defendants. No honest lawyer can tell you exactly what your case is worth on the first call. What we can do is give you a structured range once we know the medical picture.
What does it cost to hire a Lyft accident lawyer?
Nothing upfront. Kaiser Romanello, P.A. handles every Florida Lyft accident case on a contingency-fee basis. That means we advance the costs of investigation, expert witnesses, filing fees, and court costs ourselves. You pay no retainer, no hourly bills, and no out-of-pocket expenses. Our fee is a percentage of the recovery, paid only if and when we win money for you. If we do not recover anything, you owe us nothing — not even costs. The contingency model exists precisely so that injured people who cannot afford to write a check to a lawyer can still get serious legal representation against a $20 billion technology company.
Talk to a Florida Lyft Accident Lawyer Today
Free, confidential case review with an attorney. No fee unless we win.
Kaiser Romanello, P.A. · Serving all of Florida.
Sources & Authoritative References
- Fla. Stat. §627.748 — Transportation Network Company liability and insurance requirements
- Fla. Stat. §95.11 — Statute of limitations (as amended by HB 837, 2023)
- Fla. Stat. §627.737 — PIP serious injury threshold
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — Distracted driving research
- Florida DHSMV — Traffic crash report dashboard
Contact Us Today
Recent Victories for Clients
$5 Million
Negligent Security
$4 Million
Truck Accident
$1 Million
Ride Share
$1 Million
Car Accident
“Kaiser Romanello changed my life. They are The Dream Team! Could not recommend them anymore! If you want to get the most money for your personal injury claim call Kaiser Romanello today!”
-Lu R
Former client
“l just got off the phone with Mr. Loren Kaiser for a free consultation and he was absolutely amazing. He was extremely helpful, detail oriented and did not add any “rushed” feeling to the phone call. If I have anything substantial to move forward with, I will proudly utilize this law office. Thank you, Mr. Kaiser, for your help, input and advice! It is greatly appreciated.”
-Trina R
Former client
“Steve and his partner are just very knowledgeable, amazing client service, Steve it is the kind of persons who loves what he is doing, he went about and beyond his lawyer responsibilities in my case, they care about you, If you are looking for professionals at the highest levels, use their services. Not only you will be represented by top lawyers, but you feel like part of the family. Thanks for everything, God bless you.”
-Carlos V
Former client
